Why did Spanish settlers turn to Africa slaves to provide the labor for their American colonies


Answer 1
Answer: There were a couple of reasons why Spanish settlers turned to African slaves to provide labor for their american colonies:
1) The Indian slaves that they had there were already decimated by the diseases brought by the Spanish conquistadors, which left very few of them. As production rates increase, the Spanariads found it harder to find more workers. 
2) The African slaves were MUCH more cheaper then if they hired workers from Spain, for all they had too do was go there, take them away by the gunpoint, and then bring them over too the Americas too be sold. (not saying its a good thing, but facts are facts)

etc etc..

hope this helps

Related Questions

I NEED THE ANSWER ASAPPP!!! Which of these statements best summarizes the purpose of affirmative action?• To make the college admissions process equally difficult for all students.• To achieve racial equality by giving preferential treatment to minorities.• To end segregation by forcing schools to allow minority applicants.
A condition of the treaties with American Indian tribes was that tribes would haveO the ability to work the settlers' land for food.O sixty thousand dollars per acre for land they lost.O resources and services they might needO the right to continue fishing and hunting all lands freely.Mark this and returnSave and ExitNelmSubmit
2. Does our government have a monopoly over the use of force in society? Why or why not
WhT did the New Deal do for women, blacks, Indians, Mexicans, and labor?
How did the ruling of Cohens v. Virginia affect the federal government?

When Christian Crusaders captured Jerusalem in the First Crusade, they:1) slaughtered innocent Muslims and Jews.
gave safe harbor to all citizens of Jerusalem once they surrendered.
3) provided humanitarian aid of food and water to the citizens since they had
been under seige for a month.
4) forced all of the Muslims and Jews to convert to Christianity or leave the city.



When Christian Crusaders captured Jerusalem in the First Crusade they slaughtered innocent Muslims and Jews


How was life in new amsterdam different from the surrounding colonies?


Answer: A successful Dutch settlement in the colony grew up on the southern tip of Manhattan Island and was christened New Amsterdam. However, as they were ignorant of European customs of property and contracts, it was not long before the Manhattans came into armed conflict with the expanding Dutch settlement at New Amsterdam.


Final answer:

New Amsterdam, now New York, differed from surrounding colonies due to its diverse culture from European immigrants and enslaved Africans, its focus on trade rather than agriculture, and its religious tolerance. Its development was hindered by the arbitrary governance of the Dutch West India Company and the change of power in 1664 when the English took over.


Life in New Amsterdam in the 17th century differed from surrounding colonies due to its unique cultural diversity, economic structure, and political practices. New Amsterdam was a Dutch settlement primarily known for its fur trade and served as a major seaport. Moreover, it was characterized by religious tolerance and cultural diversity due to the influx of immigrants from various parts of Europe including Belgium, France, Germany and Scandinavia, in addition to the enslaved Africans. Unlike many other colonies at the time, New Amsterdam was not primarily agricultural, but its economy was largely shaped by trade and business.

Street names such as Wall Street still remind us today of the economic focus of this colony. To fortify the colony against Native American uprisings, enslaved Africans were forced to build fortifications, which is a less known fact about the origins of the city. The diversity of the colony is supposed by reports of up to 18 different languages being spoken on the streets of New Amsterdam. However, despite the economic opportunities and religious toleration, the colony grew slowly mainly due to arbitrary government set up by the Dutch West India Company. Religious dissenters who did not belong to the Dutch Reformed Church were persecuted which caused dissatisfaction among the settlers. Termination of Dutch rule in 1664 by the English further caused changes in the colony's governance and development.

Learn more about New Amsterdam here:



In history, religious beliefs have typically been either embraced, tolerated or persecuted. How does this apply to the religions/belief system of islam?



In history, religious beliefs have been typically tolerated, embraced or persecuted. In case of Islam, no one is forced to convert anyone to Islam, war can only be fought if states are threatening Islam or its followers to a degree. Even in the case of blasphemy, its advised to deal with dialogue rather than violence.


Islam is one of the major religions of the world. The followers of the Islam believe that there is only one God; Allah. Believers of the religion are known as Muslims.

The believers believe that there's only one god who created the world and the universe.

The largest group of whites in the South _______.owned no slaves
owned between one and nine slaves each
owned between ten and ninety-nine slaves each
owned over one hundred slaves each


The first one, owned no slaves.

Final answer:

The largest group of whites in the South during the slavery period in the United States did not own any slaves. Slave ownership was not common since slaves were a status symbol and a sign of wealth. Therefore, although there was a portion of whites owning slaves, the majority did not.


The largest group of whites in the South during the period of slavery in the United States owned no slaves. It is important to remember that ownership of slaves was not widespread among all whites in the South. The majority could not afford to own slaves since they were considered a status symbol and wealth indicator. While some whites did own between one and ninety-nine slaves each and a very small minority owned over one hundred slaves each, the prevalent group was non-slave owning whites.

Learn more about Slave ownership in the South here:



. After reading Roosevelt's Four Freedoms Speech, explain the historical context of this address to Congress and the nation.2. What was Roosevelt trying to do by outlining these values to the American people?

3. The textbook explains some of the reasons that Americans wanted to stay out of the war. What were some of these reasons?

4. Why was Winston Churchill relieved that the United States had been attacked by Japan? Explain.



1. The Four Freedoms speech was given at the beginning of 1941, months before Japan attacked Pearl Harbor, while there were still debates about whether the US should enter World War II or not.

2. Roosevelt was trying to gain support for an increased involvement in the war by drawing a clear line between democracies and fascist regimes.

3. Isolationism and non-interventionism were still very popular - people didn't want to get involved in what was considered a "foreign war".

4. Because it changed public opinion within the United States in favor of the war.


The Four Freedoms Speech was a famous speech by president Franklin D. Roosevelt, delivered on January 6, 1941. In this speech, Roosevelt declared that all the people in the world had a right to four freedoms: freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom from want, and freedom from fear. At the time, the stunning victories of the Axis powers in Europe and Asia were increasingly seen as existential threats to liberal democratic regimes. However, public opinion still wasn't quite ready to support open military intervention in World War II. Nevertheless, and while the United States wasn't a belligerent, it still provided substantial material aid to its allies, especially Britain, who was engaged in a fierce struggle against German troops.

By outlining what he felt were the basic freedoms of democratic regimes, Roosevelt sought to steer public perception of the war, considering it a struggle between two clashing world visions: that of democracy vs. the tyranny and opression of fascism. From this point of view, World War II was to be seen as a battle for the destiny of the world.

However, public opinion still wasn't keen on supporting the war. Isolationism and non-interventionism were still seen by many as the best foreign policy, because it was generally felt that the United States should deal with its own internal issues and don't get entangled in what was still considered a "foreign war". This position was reinforced by the economic and social after effects of the 1929 Great Depression, which were still a major issue. But as fascist powers went from victory to victory, the public started to fear that the United States would eventually become a target of invasion by either Germany or Japan, or both of them combined.

This situation radically changed on December 7, 1941, when Japanese airplanes bombed Pearl Harbor. The public was enraged with was seen as an infamous event. The very next day, the United States declared war on Japan, and a few days later declared war on Nazi Germany. Winston Churchill, the British Primer Minister, said that he was actually "relieved" by the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, as this was the event that finally broke the neutrality of the United States and made it enter the war.

What was the Trail of Tears?A.
The forced movement of Indians out of the South
When slaves were sold away from their families
The road that took slaves north to freedom
What slaves called their trip from Africa to America



A. The forced movement of Indians out of the South


The Trail of Tears was the multiple trails that Native Americans took when they were forced out of their homeland. This was part of Andrew Jackson's Indian Removal Policy, that he made when he was president. The Trail was a terrible event that caused the deaths of thousands of Native Americans.

A I’m pretty sure. Cause it took the tribes that lived in the south and relocated them west of the Mississippi River