# If the statement shown is rewritten as a conditional statement in if-then form, which best describes the conclusion? When a number is divisible by 9, the number is divisible by 3.

when a number is divisible by 9, then the number is divisible by 3.

Step-by-step explanation:

They tell us "When a number is divisible by 9, the number is divisible by 3" we could change it by:

when a number is divisible by 9, then the number is divisible by 3.

Which makes sense because the number 9 is a multiple of the number 3, which means that the 9 can be divided by 3, therefore, if the number can be divided by 9, in the same way it can be divided by 3 .

The statement "When a number is divisible by 9, the number is divisible by 3" can be rewritten in if-then form as: If a number is divisible by 9, then the number is divisible by 3.

In this case, the conclusion is that the number is divisible by 3.

Here is a table that summarizes the if-then form of the statement:

| Hypothesis | Conclusion |

|---|---|---|

| A number is divisible by 9 | The number is divisible by 3 |

In other words, if the hypothesis is true (i.e., the number is divisible by 9), then the conclusion must also be true (i.e., the number is divisible by 3).

Here is an example:

Hypothesis: The number 18 is divisible by 9.

Conclusion: The number 18 is divisible by 3.

Both the hypothesis and the conclusion are true, so the if-then statement is true.

For such more question on divisible

brainly.com/question/29373718

#SPJ3

## Related Questions

Simplify the expression:
3+ – 5(4+ – 3v)

## 15v - 17

Step-by-step explanation:

3+ – 5(4+ – 3v) can be written as

3 - 5( 4 - 3v)

Expand and simplify

That's

3 - 20 + 15v

15v - 17

Hope this helps you

The parabola y=x2 is scaled vertically by a factor of 7. What if the equation of the new parabola

And we want to scale vertically this parabola by a factor of 7. So then we need to multiply our function by the factor:

And then function would be:

Step-by-step explanation:

For this case we have the original function given by:

And we want to scale vertically this parabola by a factor of 7. So then we need to multiply our function by the factor:

And then function would be:

Geometry, 1 question

It’s b trust me bro

A soup can has a height of 4 inches and a radius of 2.5 inches. What's the area ofpaper needed to cover the lateral face of one soup can with a label?
OA) 62.8 in?
B) 15.7 in?
C) 78.5 in2
125.7 in2

1. The lateral surface can be thought of as the crossectional area of the surface integral over dA such that

Step-by-step explanation: took the test, hope this helps (;

It represented graphically by an upward parabola

Since the parabola is upward, then it has a minimum vertex

From the graph, the minimum vertex is (-1, 3)

Then let us answer the questions

Maximum point: None

Minimum point: (-1, 3)

To find f(-5), substitute x by 5 in the function above

To find f(6), substitute x by 6 in the function above

f(-5) = 19

f(6) = 52

Factor the difference of cubes. Select prime if the polynomial cannot be factored